The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!
From the Wiki University
What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?
Establish the planning context and framework
|
|
Authority to plan is confirmed by reference to legislation, direction, organisational or other managerial agreement. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Planning environment is clarified by analysing drivers and risk assessment. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Legislative, regulatory and organisational requirements, policy, procedures, existing arrangements and plans that may impact on the planning framework are identified and analysed. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Key stakeholders, their potential interests, sensitivities, roles and responsibilities are identified. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Planning purpose, aims, objectives and governance framework are developed and refined with stakeholders. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Develop agreed planning processes and methodology
|
|
A feasible project scope is developed, considering practical constraints. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Processes for negotiating outcomes, making decisions, reporting, and monitoring progress and quality are agreed. Completed |
Evidence:
|
A consultation and communication plan is developed and implemented. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Sources of expertise are identified to contribute specialised information and analysis as required. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Plan structure is agreed in consultation with stakeholders. Completed |
Evidence:
|
A project plan is prepared and approved in consultation with stakeholders. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Undertake risk research and analysis
|
|
Project scope is reviewed in response to new information or changes in resources and planning environment. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Appropriate research tools are applied. Completed |
Evidence:
|
A comprehensive body of emergency riskinformation is built and/or updated using credible sources. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Effectiveness of current emergency risk management strategies is assessed. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Organisational vulnerability is determined by analysing susceptibility and resilience to risk. Completed |
Evidence:
|
The plan’s role as an appropriate risk treatment is confirmed. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Develop/refine planning parameters
|
|
Emergency management arrangements are reviewed or developed to identify potential gaps or duplication in roles and responsibilities. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Emergency management strategies and responsibilities are identified and confirmed in consultation with stakeholders. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Broad categories and types of resources and services that are likely to be required, including potential critical shortfalls, are identified. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Financial and contractual arrangements for accessing or acquiring resources and services are developed. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Arrangements for the command, control and coordination of any emergency response or recovery operation are confirmed. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Contingencies to address potential problems are developed with relevant organisations and service providers. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Organisational implications of new or revised plans are assessed. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Document the emergency plan
|
|
Plan is iteratively developed in consultation with stakeholders. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Plan is prepared in a format prescribed by organisational standards and consistent with broader jurisdictional emergency management arrangements. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Language used is clear, concise and appropriate for the audience. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Planning records, supporting documentation and contact information are maintained to organisational standards. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Validate and implement planning outcomes
|
|
Compatibility, links and interactions between the plan and other organisational documentation is tested. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Support for the plan is established by promoting its specific benefits to stakeholders. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Monitor and review the planning process and outcomes
|
|
A maintenance, audit and exercise schedule is implemented in accordance with organisational, policy or procedures. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Deficiencies identified during audit, activation or exercising of the plan are analysed and reported to the relevant party. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Plan amendments are negotiated, documented and authorised in accordance with organisational procedures. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Opportunities for improving emergency planning processes are reported. Completed |
Evidence:
|